“..The environmental movement is divided over the importance of small steps—
– are they a critical starting point .. or a distraction from needed policy and institutional changes?
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step, but will small changes add up to the kind of massive shift needed to bring us toward sustainability?
We say sweat the small stuff—but not because small decisions add independently to big change.
Rather, because societal change isn’t just additive like stair-climbing, it’s transformative like metamorphosis ..
.. and small actions play a crucial role.
Practiced consistently, small steps facilitate both gradual evolution and rapid revolution for positive lasting change.
Of course institutional and policy change is crucial, but it doesn’t happen on its own; it happens when people fight for it, motivated by their values.
And if structural change happens without support from people’s values, then people resent it and resist or revolt.
So it’s not a choice between small stuff or large, it’s a question of how we can integrate the two to get value change that also motivates broad action.
The abolitionist movement in England in the 1800s was bolstered by personal actions, such as hosts refusing to serve sugar.
Not only did this small step give participants, primarily women, a feeling of virtue or self worth ..
.. but it became a way to demonstrate their values .. and instigate dialogue about slavery with those in their inner circles.
These “small†actions empowered women ..
.. and transformed them into activists who played a pivotal momentum-building role in the fight against slavery..”
(recommended-read..)
go to source/story>>How personal actions can kick-start a sustainability revolution | Grist
