‘the original ‘mad man’…dosen’t think much of the portrayals of his contemporaries…on the ‘mad men’ telly-show…(‘ He wonders why the producers “go whole hog to depict the scum of the industry … rather than the upbeat world of cultural creativity’)…

“…Now, I’m not suggesting the men of “Mad Men” should be puritans.

Heavens, no.

And everyone is at least a small product of the environment in which they swim.

We all make mistakes … and have our dark sides … as we navigate through life.

But the naked cruelty and overwhelming insensitivity manifested by the show’s male characters sometimes takes one’s breath away.

Why is the show so stacked against women?

Why are these men so unworthy and sadistic?

Was male behavior so despicable across the board in the upper echelons of the advertising industry in the mid-1960s …

… that the writers and producers of the show couldn’t produce a single mensch …

… one man of character … one person with something akin to enlightened values?

After all, this year’s show takes place in 1965, not the stone age.

Betty Friedan wrote The Feminine Mystique in 1963.

Or more to the point: was the advertising business so sleazy, so lacking moral compass, so hungry for success …

… that almost everyone was a manipulative ogre … and it was truly a bad man’s world?

Does “Mad Men,” the show everyone thinks accurately depicts the advertising industry of the ’60s, have to be this way?

George Lois doesn’t think so.

Sometimes called the original Mad Man … Lois is an eminence grise of the creative forces that transformed advertising in the 1960s …

… and he thinks the show gets it all wrong.

Lois writes in an essay in Playboy that there was a true revolution in advertising during the period of “Mad Men,”….

… started in the 1950s by one of creative advertising’s firsts, Bill Bernbach.

It was about joining talented copywriters with visionary graphic designers, “giving birth to the first truly creative agency.”

“Power had been taken away from the account executives and the business men … and transferred to the talented people who actually made the ads.”

Lois suggests that “Mad Men” misrepresents the advertising industry by ignoring this revolution …

… which changed the world of communications forever: …

…”The mortal sin of omission makes ‘Mad Men’ a lie.”

According to Lois, the show’s creator, Matthew Weiner, disagrees, saying that “George Lois is a legend…but Sterling Cooper is not cutting edge; it’s mired in the past.”

To which Lois responds: “Huh?”

He wonders why the producers “go whole hog to depict the scum of the industry … rather than the upbeat world of cultural creativity.”

Lois, ever colorful with his copy, calls the men in “Mad Men” “phony, gray, flannel suited, male chauvinist, no talent, WASP, white shirted, racist, anti-Semitic, Republican SOBS.”

“‘Mad Men’ has given the world the perception that the scatology of the Sterling Cooper workplace was industry wide.

In their advertising, the show’s creators have the balls to proclaim that ‘Mad Men’ explores the ‘Golden Age of Advertising,’ …

… but they surely know they are shoveling shit.”…” (cont..)

go to source/story>>>The 7 Worst Men of Mad Men: Do They Have to Be Such Jerks? | Media and Culture | AlterNet

This entry was posted in international politics/culture/ stuff, music/ent/lit, reviews. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply