“…Who, if not this woman, should be able to speak intelligently about the dangers of drugs?
By attempting to downplay marijuana’s reputation for relative safety – she ends up coming across as oblivious or indifferent to the basic facts about drugs that everyone learns in school.
The idea that there’s a hierarchy of drug dangers is so widely understood that there’s really no sense in even challenging it.
That’s why the question wasn’t even that big of a trap.
There is simply no reason at all that the DEA administrator can’t just tell everyone outright that, no, marijuana is not as dangerous as heroin.
That’s just a fact.
It’s the only answer she can give that won’t make her look foolish -
- and not looking like a fool in front of Congress and the American people ought to be more important than maintaining such an absurd stance as this.
The irony of it all is that Leonhart’s silly statement comes at a time when more people are paying attention to the issue than ever before.
When the public is exhibiting increased skepticism about our drug policy priorities, the need for candid and intelligent commentary from public officials is that much greater.
If more people are asking questions about the issue, then our policy-makers should be giving longer answers, not shorter ones.
The power to enforce these laws should never be separated from the obligation to articulate whatever wisdom and necessity underscores them.
When political posturing compromises a spokesperson’s ability to speak intelligently about their own area of expertise, it’s a sign that something is wrong.
In this case, that something is our nation’s ongoing war on marijuana, a fiasco so embarrassing and inexplicable that insisting the stuff is as bad as heroin -
- remains a top argument in its defense…”
(cont..)
go to source/story>>>
Scott Morgan: If the DEA Can’t Tell Us the Difference Between Marijuana and Heroin, Who Can?.
